Comparing model performance with a simple baseline

In this notebook, we present how to compare the generalization performance of a model to a minimal baseline. In regression, we can use the DummyRegressor class to predict the mean target value observed on the training set without using the input features.

We now demonstrate how to compute the score of a regression model and then compare it to such a baseline on the California housing dataset.

Note

If you want a deeper overview regarding this dataset, you can refer to the section named “Appendix - Datasets description” at the end of this MOOC.

from sklearn.datasets import fetch_california_housing

data, target = fetch_california_housing(return_X_y=True, as_frame=True)
target *= 100  # rescale the target in k$

Across all evaluations, we will use a ShuffleSplit cross-validation splitter with 20% of the data held on the validation side of the split.

from sklearn.model_selection import ShuffleSplit

cv = ShuffleSplit(n_splits=30, test_size=0.2, random_state=0)

We start by running the cross-validation for a simple decision tree regressor which is our model of interest. Besides, we will store the testing error in a pandas series to make it easier to plot the results.

import pandas as pd
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeRegressor
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_validate

regressor = DecisionTreeRegressor()
cv_results_tree_regressor = cross_validate(
    regressor, data, target, cv=cv, scoring="neg_mean_absolute_error", n_jobs=2
)

errors_tree_regressor = pd.Series(
    -cv_results_tree_regressor["test_score"], name="Decision tree regressor"
)
errors_tree_regressor.describe()

count    30.000000
mean     45.709375
std       1.270852
min      42.790252
25%      45.033623
50%      45.646700
75%      46.694564
max      48.084202
Name: Decision tree regressor, dtype: float64

Then, we evaluate our baseline. This baseline is called a dummy regressor. This dummy regressor will always predict the mean target computed on the training target variable. Therefore, the dummy regressor does not use any information from the input features stored in the dataframe named data.

from sklearn.dummy import DummyRegressor

dummy = DummyRegressor(strategy="mean")
result_dummy = cross_validate(
    dummy, data, target, cv=cv, scoring="neg_mean_absolute_error", n_jobs=2
)
errors_dummy_regressor = pd.Series(
    -result_dummy["test_score"], name="Dummy regressor"
)
errors_dummy_regressor.describe()

count    30.000000
mean     91.140009
std       0.821140
min      89.757566
25%      90.543652
50%      91.034555
75%      91.979007
max      92.477244
Name: Dummy regressor, dtype: float64

We now plot the cross-validation testing errors for the mean target baseline and the actual decision tree regressor.

all_errors = pd.concat(
    [errors_tree_regressor, errors_dummy_regressor],
    axis=1,
)
all_errors

	Decision tree regressor	Dummy regressor
0	47.336889	90.713153
1	47.115550	90.539353
2	44.110407	91.941912
3	43.620679	90.213912
4	48.084202	92.015862
5	45.182018	90.542490
6	43.651443	89.757566
7	44.985603	92.477244
8	45.361547	90.947952
9	44.732816	91.991373
10	46.738223	92.023571
11	46.003719	90.556965
12	45.699169	91.539567
13	45.502612	91.185225
14	46.936813	92.298971
15	44.902055	91.084639
16	45.594232	90.984471
17	47.081846	89.981744
18	45.177681	90.547140
19	47.094761	89.820219
20	42.790252	91.768721
21	46.251298	92.305556
22	45.301590	90.503017
23	46.563585	92.147974
24	46.180781	91.386320
25	45.712303	90.815660
26	44.288710	92.216574
27	46.258544	90.107460
28	45.380366	90.620318
29	47.641542	91.165331

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np

bins = np.linspace(start=0, stop=100, num=80)
all_errors.plot.hist(bins=bins, edgecolor="black")
plt.legend(bbox_to_anchor=(1.05, 0.8), loc="upper left")
plt.xlabel("Mean absolute error (k$)")
_ = plt.title("Cross-validation testing errors")

We see that the generalization performance of our decision tree is far from being perfect: the price predictions are off by more than 45,000 US dollars on average. However it is much better than the mean price baseline. So this confirms that it is possible to predict the housing price much better by using a model that takes into account the values of the input features (housing location, size, neighborhood income…). Such a model makes more informed predictions and approximately divides the error rate by a factor of 2 compared to the baseline that ignores the input features.

Note that here we used the mean price as the baseline prediction. We could have used the median instead. See the online documentation of the sklearn.dummy.DummyRegressor class for other options. For this particular example, using the mean instead of the median does not make much of a difference but this could have been the case for dataset with extreme outliers.